RESOLUTION NO. 2014-0035 Adopted by the Sacramento City Council February 4, 2014 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT BACKGROUND A. The City’s Fiscal Year (FY) 2012/13 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) was prepared to present the City’s financial condition and the results of its activities for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013. The CAFR financial statements were audited, as required by the City Charter, by an independent public accounting firm. B. The public accounting firm of Macias Gini & O’Connell, LLP, audited the City’s FY 2012/13 financial statements and rendered its unqualified opinion that the financial statements are fairly presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. C. The General Fund’s budgetary results for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, provided $10.45 million in resources to address the City’s budget priorities outlined in the FY2013/14 Midyear Report. BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council accepts the FY2012/13 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, attached hereto as Exhibit A. Section 2. Exhibit A is part of this resolution. Table of Contents: Exhibit A-Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 1 of 267 Adopted by the City of Sacramento City Council on February 4, 2014, by the following vote: Ayes: Members Ashby, Cohn, Fong, Hansen, Pannell, Schenirer, and Warren Noes: None Abstain: None Absent: Member McCarty and Mayor Johnson Attest: Shirley Concolino, City Clerk Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 2 of 267 Shirley A. Concolino Digitally signed by Shirley A. Concolino DN: cn=Shirley A. Concolino, o=City of Sacramento, ou=City Clerk, email=sconcolino@cityofsacramento.org, c=US Date: 2014.02.06 09:37:46 -08'00' Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2013 CITY OF SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 3 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 4 of 267 CITY OF SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTORY SECTION PAGE FINANCIAL SECTION BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 5 of 267 CITY OF SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS, Continued COMBINING FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PAGE Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 6 of 267 CITY OF SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS, Continued PAGE STATISTICAL SECTION (Unaudited) Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 7 of 267 CITY OF SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS, Continued STATISTICAL SECTION (Unaudited) PAGE Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 8 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 9 of 267 John F. Shirey City Manager City Hall 915 I Street, Fifth Floor Sacramento, CA 95814-2604 916-808-5704 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 10 of 267 [ Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 11 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 12 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 13 of 267 Shirley Concolino John F. Shirey Jim Sanchez Russell Fehr Sam Somers Ray Jones Jim Combs Barbara Bonebrake Jerry Way Gary S. Cook Reina Schwartz Leyne Milstein Geri Hamby Jim Rinehart Dave Brent Jorge Oseguera Max Fernandez Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 14 of 267 As of June 30, 2013 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 15 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 16 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 17 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 18 of 267 Walnut Creek Oakland LA/Century City Newport Beach San Diego Seattle www.mgocpa.com Sacramento 3000 S Street, Suite 300 Sacramento, CA 95816 916.928.4600 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Sacramento, California Report on the Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, the discretely presented component unit, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Sacramento, California (the City) as of and for the year ended June 30, 2013, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents. Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Auditor’s Responsibility Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions. Opinions In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, the discretely presented component unit, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Sacramento, California, as of June 30, 2013, and the respective changes in financial position and, where applicable, cash flows thereof and the respective budgetary comparisons for the general fund and Measure U special revenue fund for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 19 of 267 Other Matters Required Supplementary Information Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the management’s discussion and analysis, and schedules of funding progress for the pension plan and other post employment benefits plan be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management’s responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance. Other Information Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements. The introductory section, combining and individual nonmajor fund financial statements, and statistical section are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the basic financial statements. The combining and individual nonmajor fund financial statements are the responsibility of management and were derived from and relate directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the combining and individual nonmajor fund financial statements are fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole. The introductory and statistical sections have not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on them. Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated January 22, 2014 on our consideration of the City’s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the City’s internal control over financial reporting and compliance. Sacramento, California January 22, 2014 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 20 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 21 of 267 Governmental activities Business-type activities Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 22 of 267 Component unit - Governmental funds - Proprietary funds Fiduciary funds fiduciary Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 23 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 24 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 25 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 26 of 267 City of Sacramento Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Continued) (Required Supplementary Information - Unaudited) Analysis of the changes in net position: Governmental activities: Revenue Expenses Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 27 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 28 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 29 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 30 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 31 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 32 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 33 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 34 of 267 City of Sacramento Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Continued) (Required Supplementary Information - Unaudited) Credit rating ECONOMIC FACTORS AND NEXT YEAR’S BUDGET Economic Factors Next Year’s Budget Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 35 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 36 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 37 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 38 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 39 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 40 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 41 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 42 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 43 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 44 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 45 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 46 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 47 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 48 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 49 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 50 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 51 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 52 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 53 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 54 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 55 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 56 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 57 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 58 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 59 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 60 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 61 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 62 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 63 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 64 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 65 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 66 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 67 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 68 of 267 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Service Concession Arrangements. The Financial Reporting Entity: Omnibus – an amendment of GASB Statements No. 14 and No. 34. Codification of Accounting and Financial Reporting Guidance Contained in Pre-November 30, 1989 FASB and AICPA Pronouncement. Items Previously Reported as Assets and Liabilities. Technical Corrections – 2012 – an amendment of GASB Statements No. 10 and No. 62. Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions Codification of Accounting and Financial Reporting Guidance Contained in Pre- November 30, 1989 FASB and AICPA Pronouncements Financial Reporting for Pension Plans – an amendment of GASB Statement No. 25. Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions – an amendment of GASB Statement No. 27. Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 69 of 267 Government Combinations and Disposals of Government Operations. Accounting and Financial Reporting for Nonexchange Financial Guarantees. Pension Transition for Contributions Made Subsequent to the Measurement Date. Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 70 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 71 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 72 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 73 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 74 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 75 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 76 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 77 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 78 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 79 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 80 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 81 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 82 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 83 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 84 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 85 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 86 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 87 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 88 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 89 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 90 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 91 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 92 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 93 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 94 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 95 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 96 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 97 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 98 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 99 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 100 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 101 of 267 Objective of the interest rate swap. Terms. Fair value. Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 102 of 267 Credit risk. Basis risk. Termination risk. Rollover Risk. Swap payments and associated debt. Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 103 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 104 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 105 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 106 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 107 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 108 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 109 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 110 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 111 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 112 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 113 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 114 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 115 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 116 of 267 City of Sacramento Notes to the Financial Statements SUCCESSOR AGENCY TRUST FUND (Continued) Capital Assets Long-term Debt Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 117 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 118 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 119 of 267 City of Sacramento Notes to the Financial Statements RECLASSIFICATIONS AND RESTATEMENTS Capital Asset Adjustments Fund Reclassifications Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 120 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 121 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 122 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 123 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 124 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 125 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 126 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 127 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 128 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 129 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 130 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 131 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 132 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 133 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 134 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 135 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 136 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 137 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 138 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 139 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 140 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 141 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 142 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 143 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 144 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 145 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 146 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 147 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 148 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 149 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 150 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 151 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 152 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 153 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 154 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 155 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 156 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 157 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 158 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 159 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 160 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 161 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 162 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 163 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 164 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 165 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 166 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 167 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 168 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 169 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 170 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 171 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 172 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 173 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 174 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 175 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 176 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 177 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 178 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 179 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 180 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 181 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 182 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 183 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 184 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 185 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 186 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 187 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 188 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 189 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 190 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 191 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 192 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 193 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 194 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 195 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 196 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 197 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 198 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 199 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 200 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 201 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 202 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 203 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 204 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 205 of 267 City of Sacramento Net Position by Component (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Last Ten Fiscal Years 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Fiscal Year Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 206 of 267 City of Sacramento Net Position by Component (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Last Ten Fiscal Years 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Fiscal Year Page 2 of 2 171 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 207 of 267 Governmental Activities Business type activities Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 208 of 267 Governmental Activities Business type activities Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 209 of 267 Governmental activities Business - type activities Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 210 of 267 Governmental activities Business - type activities Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 211 of 267 Governmental activities Business-type activities Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 212 of 267 Governmental activities Business-type activities Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 213 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 214 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 215 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 216 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 217 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 218 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 219 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 220 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 221 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 222 of 267 City of Sacramento Property Tax Levies and Collections (1) (2) Last Ten Fiscal Years Fiscal Year Taxes Levied Collection Ended for the Percentage in Subsequent Percentage June 30 Fiscal Year Amount of Levy Years Amount of Levy Collected within the Fiscal Year of the Levy Total Collections to Date Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 223 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 224 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 225 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 226 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 227 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 228 of 267 (in millions of dollars) Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 229 of 267 City of Sacramento Principal Employers Current Fiscal Year and Nine Years Ago Percentage Percentage Employer (A) Employee (A) Rank of Total Employee (A) Rank of Total Employment (B) Employment (B) 2006 2013 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 230 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 231 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 232 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 233 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 234 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 235 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 236 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 237 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 238 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 239 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 240 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 241 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 242 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 243 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 244 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 245 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 246 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 247 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 248 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 249 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 250 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 251 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 252 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 253 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 254 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 255 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 256 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 257 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 258 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 259 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 260 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 261 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 262 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 263 of 267 City of Sacramento Operating Indicators by Function/Program Last Ten Fiscal Years Function/program 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Police Fire General Services Public Works Convention, Culture & Leisure Parks and Recreation Community Development Water Wastewater Storm Drainage Solid Waste Fiscal Year Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 264 of 267 Function/program 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Police Fire Public Works Parks and recreation Water Sewers and storm drainage Off-street parking Golf Marina City of Sacramento Capital Asset Statistics by Function/Program Last Ten Fiscal Years Fiscal Year Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 265 of 267 Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 266 of 267 • The City of Sacramento was founded in 1849 and is the oldest incorporated city in California. • In 1920, city voters adopted a Charter (municipal constitution) and a City Council/City Manager form of government. • The City is divided into eight districts. • Elected members of the City Council serve a four-year term. • The Mayor is elected by all voters in the City. In 2002, voters approved a measure for the Mayor to serve full-time. All other Councilmembers are elected by district and serve part-time. • The Mayor and other Councilmembers have an equal vote in all matters. • The City of Sacramento currently encompasses approximately 99 square miles. • The current estimated population is 473,509. CITY OF SACRAMENTO FACTS KEVIN JOHNSON Mayor ANGELIQUE ASHBY Vice Mayor, District 1 ALLEN WARREN Councilmember, District 2 STEVE COHN Councilmember, District 3 STEVE HANSEN Councilmember, District 4 JAY SCHENIRER Councilmember, District 5 KEVIN MCCARTY Councilmember, District 6 DARRELL FONG Councilmember, District 7 BONNIE J. PANNELL Councilmember, District 8 www.CityofSacramento.org Resolution 2014-0035 February 4, 2014 Page 267 of 267 2014-0035 Council 2/4/2014 12:00:00 AM Fiscal Year 2012/13 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR)

RESOLUTION NO. 2014-0297 Adopted by the Sacramento City Council August 26, 2014 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, TRANSFERRING FUNDS, AND AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR THE 2014 STREET OVERLAY PROJECT BACKGROUND A. The 2014 Street Overlay Project is part of an annual preventative maintenance program that extends the life of City streets and reduces the need for costly road reconstruction. B. The project was advertised and three bids were received on June 18, 2014. Martin Brothers Construction is the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. C. Construction is expected to begin in September 2014 and be completed in November 2014. BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Plans and Specifications for the 2014 Street Overlay Project are approved. Section 2. The FY2014/15 Capital Improvement Program budget is amended by transferring $315,375 from 2013 Street Overlay and Seal Program (R15132000), and $134,056 from the 2014 Trench Cut Fee Program (R15142500) to the 2014 Street Overlay and Seal Program (R15142000). Section 3. A contract is awarded to Martin Brothers Construction in an amount not to exceed $2,038,885.96 for the 2014 Street Overlay Project. Table of Contents: Exhibit A - Maps of the 2014 Street Overlay Project – 3 Pages Resolution 2014-0297 August 26, 2014 Page 1 of 5 Adopted by the City of Sacramento City Council on August 26, 2014, by the following vote: Ayes: Members Ashby, Cohn, Hansen, McCarty, Schenirer and Warren Noes: None Abstain: None Absent: Member Fong and Mayor Johnson Vacant: District 8 Attest: Shirley Concolino, City Clerk Resolution 2014-0297 August 26, 2014 Page 2 of 5 Shirley A. Concolino Digitally signed by Shirley A. Concolino DN: cn=Shirley A. Concolino, o=City of Sacramento, ou=City Clerk, email=sconcolino@cityofsacramento.org, c=US Date: 2014.08.28 17:33:55 -07'00' 2014 STREET OVERLAY PROJECT PN: R15142019 Council District 6 Overlay Map No. 1 Resolution 2014-0297 August 26, 2014 Page 3 of 5 2014 STREET OVERLAY PROJECT PN: R15142019 Council District 1 Overlay Map No. 2 Resolution 2014-0297 August 26, 2014 Page 4 of 5 2014 STREET OVERLAY PROJECT PN: R15142019 Council District 3 Overlay Map No. 3 Resolution 2014-0297 August 26, 2014 Page 5 of 5 2014-0297 Council 8/26/2014 12:00:00 AM

RESOLUTION NO. 2014-0095 Adopted by the Sacramento City Council April 22, 2014 DEL PASO NUEVO PHASE I V PROJECT: AUTHORIZING $975,000 CITY HOUSING TRUST FUNDS FOR A REVOLVING CONSTRUCTION LOAN; EXECUTION OF OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT AND RELATED DOCUMENTS WITH DEL PASO HOMES, INC.; RELATED BUDGET AMENDMENT, AND ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS BACKGROUND A. Del Paso Homes, Inc. has applied for a loan of up to $975,000 of City Housing Trust Funds (HTF) to assist in funding the phased construction of 20 single- family homes in the Del Paso Nuevo Phase IV project that will be affordable to families earning 80 percent or less of area median income. B. The Del Paso Nuevo Phase IV project is consistent with the City HTF Ordinance and with the adopted Housing Trust Fund Program guidelines except as noted below. It is also consistent with Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency financing and program guidelines. C. In conjunction with a private construction loan in the minimum amount of $1,250,000 the Developer will complete the construction of 37 total homes remaining to be built in the project in three phases of 12, 12, and 13 homes respectively. D. To facilitate completion of the project, the Developer has requested it assume the $370,000 balance of the existing land loan originally made by the former Redevelopment Agency of the City of Sacramento and now held by the Housing Authority of the City or Sacramento as its successor in interest. E. The impacts of the entire Del Paso Nuevo project were evaluated in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted for the project. This action does not constitute a new project or a change in the project under CEQA; therefore, no further environmental review is required per CEQA Guidelines Sections 15378 and 15162. Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 1 of 77 F. A Finding of No Significant Impact was made pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for the Del Paso Nuevo Project and the data and conditions upon which it was based remain unchanged. There is nofederalfundingassociated with this action and there has been no change in the scope of work and there are no new circumstances that would have any direct or indirect effect on the environment that was not previously considered. Therefore, no further action under National Environmen tal Policy Act (NEPA) is required. BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. All of the evidence having been duly considered, the facts as stated in the Background above are found to be true and correct. Section 2. The Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency (Agency) is authorized to amend the Agency budget to allocate $975,000 of City Housing Trust funds to the Del Paso Nuevo Phase IV project. Section 3. The Agency is authorized to enter in an Owner Participation Agreement with, and make a $975,000 revolving construction loan to, Del Paso Homes, I nc. or related entity for the financing of the Del Paso Nuevo Phase IV ("Loan"), on standard Agency documents in forms as approved by Agency Counsel. Section 4. The Agency is authorized to make this Loan without a Notice of Funding Availability and with individual regulatory agreements on the regulated homes having terms of 15-years as permissible exceptions under the City Housing Trust Fund Program guidelines. Section 5. The Agency is authorized to accept the assignment of the existing land loan promissory note and its deed of trust with a remaining amount of $370,000, which is the balance of the existing land loan, from the Housing Authority of the City or Sacramento to be included in the funding associated with the Owner Participation Agreement. Section 6. The Agency is authorized to enter into and execute all other documents, as approved to form by Agency Counsel, and perform other actions necessary to ensure proper repayment of the Agency funds including without limitation, subordination, extensions, and restructuring of such a loan consistent with Agency adopted policy and with this resolution. Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 2 of 77 Table of Contents: Exhibit A: Owner ParticipationAgreement Exhibit B: Construction and Permanent Loan Agreement Adopted by the City of Sacramento City Council on April 22, 2014, by the following vote: Ayes: Members Ashby, Cohn, Fong, Hansen, McCarty, Pannell, Schenirer, Warren and Mayor Johnson. Noes: None Abstain: None Absent: None Attest: Shirley Concolino, City Clerk Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 3 of 77 Shirley A. Concolino Digitally signed by Shirley A. Concolino DN: cn=Shirley A. Concolino, o=City of Sacramento, ou=City Clerk, email=sconcolino@cityofsacramento.org, c=US Date: 2014.04.28 11:28:31 -07'00' Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 4 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 5 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 6 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 7 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 8 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 9 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 10 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 11 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 12 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 13 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 14 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 15 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 16 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 17 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 18 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 19 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 20 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 21 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 22 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 23 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 24 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 25 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 26 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 27 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 28 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 29 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 30 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 31 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 32 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 33 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 34 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 35 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 36 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 37 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 38 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 39 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 40 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 41 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 42 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 43 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 44 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 45 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 46 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 47 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 48 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 49 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 50 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 51 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 52 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 53 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 54 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 55 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 56 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 57 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 58 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 59 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 60 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 61 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 62 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 63 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 64 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 65 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 66 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 67 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 68 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 69 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 70 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 71 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 72 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 73 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 74 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 75 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 76 of 77 Resolution 2014-0095 April 22, 2014 Page 77 of 77 2014-0095 Council 4/22/2014 1:00:00 AM Del Paso Nuevo Phase IV Project: Authorizing $975,000 City Housing Trust Funds for a Revolving Construction Loan; Execution of Owner Participation Agreement and Related Documents with Del Paso

RESOLUTION NO. 2014-0243 Adopted by the Sacramento City Council July 22, 2014 RESOLUTION DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE MAJORITY PROTEST PROCEEDINGS AND RENEWING THE RIVER DISTRICT PROPERTY AND BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 2014-01 BACKGROUND A. The owners of property within the boundaries of the proposed River District Property and Business Improvement District (PBID) No. 2014-01 (District) have submitted petitions asking that the City Council renew the District. Included with the petitions was a summary of the Management District Plan (Plan) that describes the proposed assessment to be levied on property within the District to pay for the following activities and improvements: (1) safety and maintenance program to provide daily security patrol, trash abatement and mitigate the impact of homelessness; (2) economic development to attract, grow, and retain new businesses; (3) physical enhancements and advocacy to advance the design and implementation of new roadway, transit, utility, and streetscape projects. B. The proposed owners who signed the petitions will collectively pay more than 50% of the proposed assessment. Accordingly, on May 20, 2014, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2014-0125 entitled “Intention to Renew the River District Property and Business Improvement District” (the Resolution of Intention). Among other things, the Resolution of Intention states that a public hearing on the renewal of the District and the proposed assessment will be held on July 15, 2014, at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council’s chambers, Sacramento City Hall, 915 “I” Street (first floor), Sacramento, California. The Resolution of Intention also states the City Council’s finding that the Plan satisfies all requirements of Streets and Highways Code Section 36622. C. The properties within the boundaries of the District will be benefited by the activities and improvements to be funded by the proposed assessment. D. On May 22, 2014, the City Clerk mailed to each owner of record of each parcel within the District’s exterior boundaries a notice concerning the public hearing on the renewal of the District and the proposed assessment. Each notice included the statutorily required information about the assessment and the majority protest procedure, as well as an assessment ballot. Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 1 of 69 E. At 6:00 p.m. on July 15, 2014, in the City Council’s Chambers, Sacramento City Hall, 915 “I” Street (first floor), Sacramento, California, the City Council held a public hearing regarding the renewal of the District and the levy of the assessment. During the public hearing, the City Council heard and received all objections and protests to the renewal of the District and the proposed assessment. The City Clerk has received, been given custody of, and tabulated the assessment ballots returned and not withdrawn by the owners of property located within the District. The City Clerk has reported the results of the tabulation by her written Certificate to the City Council. The Clerk’s Certificate of Ballot Procedure Results for the Mailed-Ballot, Property Owner Majority Protest Proceeding indicates that, of the assessment ballots signed and returned to the City Clerk, and not withdrawn, prior to the close of the public hearing on July 15, 2014, and weighting the ballots for each property according to the proportional financial obligation of each property, 86.81 percent of the assessment ballots were in favor of the levy of the assessments as proposed, and 13.19 percent were opposed. The number of assessment ballots submitted and not withdrawn in opposition to the proposed assessment did not exceed the number of ballots submitted and not withdrawn in favor of the proposed assessment, with ballots weighted according to the amount of the assessment to be imposed upon the parcel for which each ballot was submitted. Therefore, a majority protest against the proposed assessment does not exist. F. All actions and proceedings described in paragraphs A through E were undertaken and completed in accordance with law. BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council finds and determines that the recitals set forth above are true. Section 2. No majority protest having been made through the assessment ballot procedure, the City Council: a. Overrules all protests to the proposed assessment and these proceedings; b. Approves the Engineer’s Report and Plan on the proposal to levy an annual assessment on land within the District to be renewed, attached hereto as Exhibit A and by this reference made a part of this resolution, preliminarily approved by Resolution No. 2014-0125; c. Renews the District for a ten-year term that will expire on December 31, 2024, for the territory generally described in Exhibit B, attached hereto and by this reference made a part of this resolution, as shown in the Engineer’s Report and Plan, preliminarily approved by Resolution No. 2014-0125; Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 2 of 69 d. Confirms the assessment diagram and assessment roll and, upon establishment of the District annual budget, levies the assessment on real property within the District as described in the Engineer’s Report and Plan. In accordance with Streets and Highways Code Section 36631 and the Plan, the assessment to fund the activities and improvements for the District will be collected at the same time and in the same manner as are ad valorem property taxes and will have the same lien priority and penalties for delinquent payment. Section 3. Properties within the District will be subject to any amendments to the Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994. Section 4. Bonds will not be issued. Section 5. The City Manager (or designee) is directed to take all necessary actions to complete the renewal of the District and to levy the assessment. The City Clerk is directed to record, in the Sacramento County Recorder’s office, a notice and assessment diagram as required by Streets and Highways Code Section 36627. The City Clerk is further directed to certify the passage and adoption of this resolution and to enter it in the book of original resolutions. Table of Contents: Exhibit A: Management District Plan and Engineer’s Report Exhibit B: District Map Adopted by the City of Sacramento City Council on July 22, 2014, by the following vote: Ayes: Members Ashby, Cohn, McCarty, Schenirer, Warren Noes: None Abstain: None Absent: Members Fong, Hansen and Mayor Johnson Vacant: District 8 Attest: Shirley Concolino, City Clerk Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 3 of 69 Shirley A. Concolino Digitally signed by Shirley A. Concolino DN: cn=Shirley A. Concolino, o=City of Sacramento, ou=City Clerk, email=sconcolino@cityofsacramento.org, c=US Date: 2014.07.24 12:22:45 -07'00' Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 4 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 5 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 6 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 7 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 8 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 9 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 10 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 11 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 12 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 13 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 14 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 15 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 16 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 17 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 18 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 19 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 20 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 21 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 22 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 23 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 24 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 25 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 26 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 27 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 28 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 29 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 30 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 31 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 32 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 33 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 34 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 35 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 36 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 37 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 38 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 39 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 40 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 41 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 42 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 43 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 44 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 45 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 46 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 47 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 48 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 49 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 50 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 51 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 52 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 53 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 54 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 55 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 56 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 57 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 58 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 59 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 60 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 61 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 62 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 63 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 64 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 65 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 66 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 67 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 68 of 69 Resolution 2014-0243 July 22, 2014 Page 69 of 69 2014-0243 Council 7/22/2014 1:00:00 AM Declaring Results of the Majority Protest Proceedings and Renewing the River District Property and Business Improvement District No. 2014-01

RESOLUTION NO. 2014-0299 Adopted by the Sacramento City Council September 2, 2014 SUSPENDING COMPETITIVE BIDDING IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CITY CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 3.56.230.C OF THE CITY CODE AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR HIS DESIGNEE, TO ELIMINATE 6.7 FTE IN DEPT ID 17001311 (OLD SACRAMENTO) BACKGROUND A. Maintenance of the Old Sacramento Historic District (“District”) has historically been performed by City employees in the Convention & Cultural Services Department through an office located in the District. Revenue shortfalls and General Fund budget reductions since 2009 have created a structural imbalance in the District budget (17001311), requiring the use of salary savings from holding seasonal maintenance positions vacant and reductions in event-related funding in order to plug annual budget gaps. B. The Downtown Sacramento Partnership, Inc. (“Partnership”) currently provides guides and navigators in the District who alert law enforcement to potential criminal activity, direct pedestrians to destinations within the District, and provide information to visitors regarding events and promotions within the District. The Partnership also, in partnership with the City, provides security services within the District between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. C. The City would like the Partnership to assume maintenance responsibilities within the District. D. City Code section 3.56.230 authorizes the City Council to suspend competitive bidding for the procurement of nonprofessional services when, upon a two-thirds vote of the Council, it is determined that it is in the best interest of the City to do so. Transferring maintenance responsibilities for the District from City staff to the Partnership (as described in the agreement in Exhibit A) will allow the City to tap into the Partnership’s current presence in the District, thereby providing a streamlined, cost-effective, District- tailored approach to maintenance. The Partnership’s maintenance crews can work with the Partnership staff currently onsite—the guides and navigators and security team—to identify immediate maintenance needs (beyond routine tasks) more quickly (e.g., guides can alert maintenance workers to areas requiring attention), remedy nuisances quickly, and provide maintenance staffing that is tailored to the needs of the District (e.g., adjusting work hours to accommodate special events and other high traffic times). The Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 1 of 42 cost of having the Partnership provide these services is less than that if the City were to continue to provide these services. E. No City employees will be laid off as a result of the agreement. Five employees that are currently serving the District will be transferred to the Parks and Recreation Department. One employee will be transferred to the Convention Center. BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THIS BACKGROUND, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. City Council finds and determines that it is in the best interests of the City to suspend competitive bidding for the procurement of maintenance services in the District. Section 2. Once positions have been vacated, the City Manager, or his designee, shall eliminate 6.7 fulltime equivalents (“FTEs”) from the District’s operations and transfer the associated $413,214 labor budget to the service and supply budget within the District (17001311). Table of Contents Exhibit A - Agreement with the Downtown Sacramento Partnership, Inc. for Maintenance Services in the Old Sacramento Historic District Adopted by the City of Sacramento City Council on September 2, 2014, by the following vote: Ayes: Members Ashby, Cohn, Fong, Hansen, McCarty, Schenirer and Warren Noes: None Abstain: None Absent: Mayor Johnson Vacant: District 8 Attest: Shirley Concolino, City Clerk Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 2 of 42 Shirley A. Concolino Digitally signed by Shirley A. Concolino DN: cn=Shirley A. Concolino, o=City of Sacramento, ou=City Clerk, email=sconcolino@cityofsacramento.org, c=US Date: 2014.09.09 16:00:01 -07'00' Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 3 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 4 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 5 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 6 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 7 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 8 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 9 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 10 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 11 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 12 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 13 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 14 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 15 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 16 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 17 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 18 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 19 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 20 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 21 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 22 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 23 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 24 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 25 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 26 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 27 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 28 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 29 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 30 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 31 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 32 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 33 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 34 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 35 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 36 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 37 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 38 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 39 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 40 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 41 of 42 Resolution 2014-0299 September 2, 2014 Page 42 of 42 2014-0299 Council 9/2/2014 12:00:00 AM

RESOLUTION NO. 2014-0075 Adopted by the Sacramento City Council March 25, 2014 APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE 2014 ONE-YEAR ACTION PLAN FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) AND HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR PERSONS WITH AIDS (HOPWA) FUNDED PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS; AMENDMENT OF PRIOR YEARS' ACTION PLANS; AMENDMENT TO THE SACRAMENTO HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BUDGET; AUTHORITY TO ISSUE A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS AND AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF THE RIVER DISTRICT/TWIN RIVERS CHOICE NEIGHBORHOODS INITIATIVE AND RELATED PROJECTS NOT TO EXCEED $200,000; REVISION OF THE CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN; AND EXECUTE DOCUMENTS FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS AND RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS BACKGROUND A. Since 1982 the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency (SHRA), on behalf of City, has served as the public entity designated to efficiently administer the CDBG program and was subsequently designated as the public entity to administer HOME, ESG and HOPWA funding originating from HUD. B. HUD requires the annual submittal of a One-Year Action Plan and any amendments describing proposed activities and expenditures for the following year in accordance with the goals and priorities of the Consolidated Plan. C. HOPWA is moving away from a program that relies on facility-based funding to a more stable and flexible model that provides tenant-based and time-limited housing assistance (STRMU) for eligible participants already in private market, permanent housing. D. NEPA and CEQA compliance is needed for the River District/Twin Rivers CNI project, streetscape and pedestrian improvements project along 12th Street between C Street and Richards Boulevard and the proposed Dos Rios Light Rail Station on 12th Street just south of Richards Boulevard before the projects may proceed. E. The Colonial Heights Library and adjoining garden area are in need of rehabilitation and improvements. Resolution 2014-0073 March 25, 2014 Page 1 of 14 F. On October 22, 2013, the City Council approved the 2014 One-Year Action Plan by City Resolution 2013-0344. A noticed public hearing soliciting comments on the amendments to the 2014 One-Year Action Plan and amendments to prior years' Action Plans was held by the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Commission on March 5, 20 14 . BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. All evidence presented having been duly considered, the findings, including environmental findings regarding this action, as stated in Exhibit C, are approved. Section 2. The 2014 One-Year Action Plan and the prior year's action plans are revised and amended as set forth in Exhibit A Section 3. SHRA is authorized to amend its budget to allocate the CDBG and HOPWA funding for programs and projects as set forth in Exhibits A and B. Section 4. SHRA is authorized and delegated authority to act as agent on behalf of the City of Sacramento to submit the amendments to the 2014 Action Plan and the amendments of prior years' Action Plans to HUD; execute grant agreements with HUD; and to execute agreements and contracts with the appropriate entities to carry out CDBG and HOPWA projects in accordance with the 2014 One-Year Action Plan, as amended. All such agreements shall be in compliance with applicable federal law and regulations. Section 5. SHRA is authorized to execute any and all related documents, including invoicing, contracts and amendments as necessary to carry out the federal programs and projects as described in the 2014 One-Year Action Plan and amended action plans in compliance with applicable federal law and regulations. Section 6. SHRA is authorized to issue a Request for Proposals and award a contract for environmental consulting services in support of the River District/Twin Rivers choice neighborhoods initiative project and the related projects in an amount not to exceed $200,000. Section 7. The revised Citizen Participation Plan is approved as set forth in Exhibit D. Resolution 2014-0073 March 25, 2014 Page 2 of 14 Table of Contents: Exhibit A-2014 Amended Action Plan Activities Exhibit B-Amendment to HOPWA Program Exhibit C-Environmental Determination Exhibit D-Citizen Participation Plan Adopted by the City of Sacramento City Council on March 25, 2014, by the following vote: Ayes: Members Ashby, Cohn, Fong, Hansen, McCarty, Pannell, Schenirer, Warren and Mayor Johnson Noes: None Abstain: None Absent: None Attest: Shirley Concolino, City Clerk Resolution 2014-0073 March 25, 2014 Page 3 of 14 Shirley A. Concolino Digitally signed by Shirley A. Concolino DN: cn=Shirley A. Concolino, o=City of Sacramento, ou=City Clerk, email=sconcolino@cityofsacramento.org, c=US Date: 2014.04.03 09:00:27 -07'00' Resolution 2014-0073 March 25, 2014 Page 4 of 14 Resolution 2014-0073 March 25, 2014 Page 5 of 14 Resolution 2014-0073 March 25, 2014 Page 6 of 14 Resolution 2014-0073 March 25, 2014 Page 7 of 14 Resolution 2014-0073 March 25, 2014 Page 8 of 14 Resolution 2014-0073 March 25, 2014 Page 9 of 14 Resolution 2014-0073 March 25, 2014 Page 10 of 14 Resolution 2014-0073 March 25, 2014 Page 11 of 14 Resolution 2014-0073 March 25, 2014 Page 12 of 14 Resolution 2014-0073 March 25, 2014 Page 13 of 14 Resolution 2014-0073 March 25, 2014 Page 14 of 14 2014-0075 Council 3/25/2014 12:00:00 AM Approve 1 Year Action Plan for Community Development Block Grat and Housing Opportunities for PErsons with AIDS

RESOLUTION NO. 2014-0271 Adopted by the Sacramento City Council August 7, 2014 APPROPRIATING FUNDS, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR THE 2014 STREET SEALS PROJECT BACKGROUND A. The Street Seal Coat Program is an annual preventative maintenance strategy applied to street surfaces. Approximately once every ten years surface treatments are applied to extend the useful life of the existing pavement. The Public Works Maintenance Services Division developed the existing ten-year program to maintain the quality of City streets in a cost effective manner within the available funds. B. The project was advertised and six bids were received on June 11, 2014. Valley Slurry Seal is the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. C. Construction is expected to begin in August 2014 and be completed in September 2014. D. The Sacramento Area Sewer District is responsible for funding the raising and lowering of their manholes with the City public right of way. BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Plans and Specifications for the 2014 Street Seal Project are approved. Section 2. The contract for the 2014 Street Seal Project is awarded to Valley Slurry Seal Company for an amount not to exceed $623,019. Section 3. The FY2014/15 Capital Improvement Program budget is amended by appropriating $42,625 (Fund 3702) from the Sacramento Area Sewer District to the 2013 Street Overlay and Seal Program (R15132000). Section 4. Exhibits A and B are attached and are a part of this Resolution. Table of Contents Exhibit A: Resurfacing Types Description Exhibit B: Street Location Maps Resolution 2014-0271 August 7, 2014 Page 1 of 8 Adopted by the City of Sacramento City Council on August 7, 2014, by the following vote: Ayes: Members Ashby, Cohn, Fong, Hansen, McCarty, Schenirer, Warren and Mayor Johnson Noes: None Abstain: None Absent: None Vacant: District 8 Attest: Shirley Concolino, City Clerk Resolution 2014-0271 August 7, 2014 Page 2 of 8 Shirley A. Concolino Digitally signed by Shirley A. Concolino DN: cn=Shirley A. Concolino, o=City of Sacramento, ou=City Clerk, email=sconcolino@cityofsacramento.org, c=US Date: 2014.08.13 12:05:57 -07'00' Exhibit A: Resurfacing Types Description RESURFACING TYPES The City’s 2014 Street Seal Coat Project utilizes lower cost preventative maintenance treatments to reduce the need for more costly overlays and street reconstructions in the future. Following are the treatments being used on streets for 2014: Slurry Seal – The majority of our streets will receive this type of resurfacing treatment. It’s a blend of oil and small rocks which is a one day preventative maintenance procedure. Microsurfacing – This type of resurfacing is similar to a Slurry Seal but has polymers added to the mix design to increase product durability and strength. This treatment is typically placed on heavily traveled roadways. Chip Seal – A chip seal is an application of liquid asphalt covered with small rock chips. This treatment, which adds strength to the existing pavement, is relatively long-lasting and cost-effective. This product also incorporates the use of recycled rubber tires in the mix design. Cape Seal – A cape seal consists of first applying a chip seal and then adding a slurry seal about a week later. Resolution 2014-0271 August 7, 2014 Page 3 of 8 2014 STREET SEAL COAT PROJECT PN: R15142020 Council District 1 Microsurfacing Resolution 2014-0271 August 7, 2014 Page 4 of 8 2014 STREET SEAL COAT PROJECT PN: R15142020 Council District 1 Slurry Seal Resolution 2014-0271 August 7, 2014 Page 5 of 8 2014 STREET SEAL COAT PROJECT PN: R15142020 Council District 6 Asphalt Rubber Cape Resolution 2014-0271 August 7, 2014 Page 6 of 8 2014 STREET SEAL COAT PROJECT PN: R15142020 Council District 8 Asphalt Rubber Cape Resolution 2014-0271 August 7, 2014 Page 7 of 8 2014 STREET SEAL COAT PROJECT PN: R15142020 Council District 8 Microsurfacing Resolution 2014-0271 August 7, 2014 Page 8 of 8 2014-0271 Council 8/7/2014 1:00:00 AM Appropriate Funds, Approving Plans and Specs, and Awarding Construction Contract for 2014 Street Seals Project

RESOLUTION NO. 2014-0007 Adopted by the Housing Authority of the City of Sacramento May 13, 2014 AUTHORIZATION TO EXECUTE A LONG TERM REVOCABLE PERMIT WITH NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS TO PLACE CELL TOWERS AT 1731/1725 K STREET, SACRAMENTO, CA; EN VIRONMENTAL FINDINGS BACKGROUND A. The Housing Authority of the City of Sacramento adopted Resolution HA91-036 in 1991 to authorize the Executive Director to grant easements to Utility Companies and Public Agencies. B. Over the past 22 years significant advancements in technology and changes in the legal environment have given private sector businesses incentive to pay for use of roof space or other easements to place and service their equipment. C. New Cingular Wireless PCS, a for-profit mobile voice and data communication service provider, has initiated discussions regarding a non-exclusive five (5) year revocable permit agreement, with the option to extend for four (4) renewable terms of five (5) years each for a possible total of twenty five (25) years. D. The Executive Director's delegated authority only applies to public utility companies and public agencies. Authorization is needed from the Board to execute the New Cingular Wireless PCS Agreement for Issuance of Revocable Permit. E. A duly noticed Public Hearing was held on May 7, 2014 at the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency Commission meeting to solicit public input. F. The recommended action to approve and grant a permit to place equipment in the elevator penthouse with antennas on the roof of the elevator penthouse on an existing facility located at 1725/1731 K Street is categorically exempt from California Environment Quality Act (CEQA) review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 (a) and (b) as minor alterations to the interior and exterior of buildings roof and Section 15303(d) and (e) for the utility extension and the construction of small accessory structure. The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) does not apply. Resolution 2014-0007 May 13, 2014 Page 1 of 28 BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SACRAMENTO RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The above declarations set forth in the above recitals including the environmental findings, are found to be true and correct. Section 2. The Executive Director is authorized to execute a non-exclusive Agreement for Issuance of Revocable Permit with New Cingular Wireless PCS (as set forth in Exhibit A) for the installation and servicing of equipment necessary for the provision of mobile voice and data communication services for a term not to exceed five (5) years with the option to extend for four (4) renewable terms of five (5) years each for a possible total of twenty five (25) years at the1725/1731 K Street, Sacramento, CA property. Section 3. The Executive Director is authorized to amend the Housing Authority budget to receive and allocate the first year revenue from the revocable permit of $21,600 and the three percent annual increase over the most recent 12 months' payment level received in consideration of the Agreement to 1725/ 1731 K Street, Sacramento, California for which this Agreement generated revenue. The funds shall be expended from an approved or amended property-level budget, approved by the Executive Director or her designee. Table of Contents: Exhibit A: Agreement for Issuance of Revocable Permit Adopted by the Housing Authority of the City of Sacramento on May 13, 2014, by the following vote: Ayes: Members Ashby, Cohn, Fong, Hansen, McCarty, Pannell, Schenirer, Warren Noes: None Abstain: None Absent: Mayor Johnson Attest: Shirley Concolino, Secretary Resolution 2014-0007 May 13, 2014 Page 2 of 28 Shirley A. Concolino Digitally signed by Shirley A. Concolino DN: cn=Shirley A. Concolino, o=City of Sacramento, ou=City Clerk, email=sconcolino@cityofsacramento.org, c=US Date: 2014.05.20 12:32:14 -07'00' Resolution 2014-0007 May 13, 2014 Page 3 of 28 Resolution 2014-0007 May 13, 2014 Page 4 of 28 Resolution 2014-0007 May 13, 2014 Page 5 of 28 Resolution 2014-0007 May 13, 2014 Page 6 of 28 Resolution 2014-0007 May 13, 2014 Page 7 of 28 Resolution 2014-0007 May 13, 2014 Page 8 of 28 Resolution 2014-0007 May 13, 2014 Page 9 of 28 Resolution 2014-0007 May 13, 2014 Page 10 of 28 Resolution 2014-0007 May 13, 2014 Page 11 of 28 Resolution 2014-0007 May 13, 2014 Page 12 of 28 Resolution 2014-0007 May 13, 2014 Page 13 of 28 Resolution 2014-0007 May 13, 2014 Page 14 of 28 Resolution 2014-0007 May 13, 2014 Page 15 of 28 Resolution 2014-0007 May 13, 2014 Page 16 of 28 Resolution 2014-0007 May 13, 2014 Page 17 of 28 Resolution 2014-0007 May 13, 2014 Page 18 of 28 Resolution 2014-0007 May 13, 2014 Page 19 of 28 Resolution 2014-0007 May 13, 2014 Page 20 of 28 Resolution 2014-0007 May 13, 2014 Page 21 of 28 Resolution 2014-0007 May 13, 2014 Page 22 of 28 Resolution 2014-0007 May 13, 2014 Page 23 of 28 Resolution 2014-0007 May 13, 2014 Page 24 of 28 Resolution 2014-0007 May 13, 2014 Page 25 of 28 Resolution 2014-0007 May 13, 2014 Page 26 of 28 Resolution 2014-0007 May 13, 2014 Page 27 of 28 Resolution 2014-0007 May 13, 2014 Page 28 of 28 2014-0007 Housing Authority 5/13/2014 1:00:00 AM Authorization To Execute A Long Term Revocable Permit With New Cingular Wireless Pcs To Place Cell Towers At 1731/1725 K Street, Sacramento, Ca; Environmental Findings

RESOLUTION NO. 2014-0180 Adopted by the Sacramento City Council June 10, 2014 SIERRA VISTA APARTMENTS REHABILITATION ("PROJECT"): APPROVAL OF CITY HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM ("HOME") LOAN COMMITMENT NOT TO EXCEED $1,400,000; APPROVAL OF CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (“CDBG”) LOAN COMMITMENT OF $800,000; EXECUTION OF RELATED LOAN COMMITMENTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS WITH SIERRA VISTA HOUSING ASSOCIATES, LP, OR RELATED ENTITY; RELATED BUDGET AMENDMENTS; AND ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS BACKGROUND A. Sierra Vista Housing Associates, LP, (“Developer") is a single-asset tax credit investment partnership formed to finance and rehabilitate the Sierra Vista Senior Apartments. The Developer's managing general partner is Sierra Vista Housing Associates LLC whose members are Sacramento Housing Authority Repositioning Program, Inc. ('SHARP") and an affiliate of BRIDGE Housing Corporation ("BRIDGE"). Developer has applied for an allocation of Two Million Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($2,200,000) comprised of not more than $1,400,000 of City Home Investment Partnership Program ("HOME") funds and $800,000 of City Community Development Block Grant Multifamily Residential CDBG funds (“Loan Commitment") to provide permanent financing of the 78-unit Sierra Vista apartment rehabilitation project ("Sierra Vista” or ·”Project") at 1107 23rd Street. B. SHARP and BRIDGE have entered into a ground lease and purchase option to acquire the Project dated February 14, 2014. C. The Project qualifies for HOME and CDBG funds under the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency ("Agency”) guidelines. D. The Developer has also applied for rehabilitation and construction financing in the form of seller financing (“Carryback Loan Commitment”) from the Agency on behalf of the Housing Authority of the City of Sacramento ("Housing Authority") in an amount of $6,400,000 as justified by fair market value appraisal. E. Underwriting analysis of funding needed to comprehensively rehabilitate Sierra Vista for continued service life indicates the need for the gap financing being sought by the Developer. Resolution 2014-0180 June 10, 2014 Page 1 of 13 F. The Agency has considered environmental impacts of the project in accordance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the Project is exempt due to CECA §15301, where rehabilitation to the existing facility involves no expansion or change to the existing use. Review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is currently underway and will be completed prior to any choice limiting action. BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. All of the evidence having been duly considered, the findings, including the environmental findings, as stated above, are found to be true and correct. Section 2. That the Sierra Vista Project is a priority housing project. Section 3. The Loan Commitment letter, attached as Exhibit A, for financing the Project with up to $1,400,000 of City HOME funds and $800,000 of CDBG funds is approved. Section 4. The Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency (Agency) is delegated authority to execute and transmit the Loan Commitment to SHARP and Bridge (Developer) upon evidence of withdrawal by Developer of the pending 9% tax credit application and award for the Sutterview Project. The Executive Director is authorized to executed and transmit the Loan Commitment to Developer as attached as Exhibit A. Section 5. The Agency is authorized to amend the Agency budget and allocate up to $1,400,000 in City HOME funds to the Project. Section 6. The Agency is authorized to amend the Agency budget and allocate up to $600,000 in City CDBG funds to the Project and $200,000 in City CDBG Multifamily Revolving Loan Funds. Section 7. The City will set a public hearing on July 15, 2014, at which time Agency staff will recommend an allocation of $850,000 in CDBG Single Family Housing and Economic Development Revolving Loan Fund for the Sierra Vista Project. Table of Contents Exhibit A: Loan Commitment Letter Resolution 2014-0180 June 10, 2014 Page 2 of 13 Adopted by the City of Sacramento City Council on June 10, 2014, by the following vote: Ayes: Members Cohn, Fong, Hansen, McCarty, Pannell, and Schenirer Noes: Member Warren Abstain: None Absent: Members Ashby and Mayor Johnson Attest: Shirley Concolino, City Clerk Resolution 2014-0180 June 10, 2014 Page 3 of 13 Shirley A. Concolino Digitally signed by Shirley A. Concolino DN: cn=Shirley A. Concolino, o=City of Sacramento, ou=City Clerk, email=sconcolino@cityofsacramento.org, c=US Date: 2014.06.24 16:07:27 -07'00' Resolution 2014-0180 June 10, 2014 Page 4 of 13 Resolution 2014-0180 June 10, 2014 Page 5 of 13 Resolution 2014-0180 June 10, 2014 Page 6 of 13 Resolution 2014-0180 June 10, 2014 Page 7 of 13 Resolution 2014-0180 June 10, 2014 Page 8 of 13 Resolution 2014-0180 June 10, 2014 Page 9 of 13 Resolution 2014-0180 June 10, 2014 Page 10 of 13 Resolution 2014-0180 June 10, 2014 Page 11 of 13 Resolution 2014-0180 June 10, 2014 Page 12 of 13 Resolution 2014-0180 June 10, 2014 Page 13 of 13 2014-0180 Council 6/10/2014 1:00:00 AM Sierra Vista Apartments Rehabilitation Project

RESOLUTION NO. 2014-0296 Adopted by the Sacramento City Council August 26, 2014 REGIONAL TRANSIT POLICE SERVICES CONTACT BACKGROUND A. On March 11, 2014, City Council approved the fourth amendment to Agreement 2011- 0733 with Sacramento Regional Transit (RT) to upgrade the Mobile Data Computer (MDC) and In-Car-Camera (ICC) equipment in the Regional Transit patrol vehicles operated by Sacramento Police Department (SPD) officers. The total cost to replace the ICC and MDC equipment is $357,364. The Agreement stipulates that RT will reimburse the City for 50 percent of the total project costs, up to $178,682 and the SPD will fund the remaining 50 percent with available funding in the NextGen Multi-Year Operating Project (MYOP) (I1100100), up to $178,682. To properly account for RT’s contribution, a revenue and expense budget adjustment of $178,682, to the SPD’s General Fund operating budget, is necessary. BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Manager, or the City Manager’s designee, is authorized to increase the expense and revenue budgets in the Sacramento Police Department’s General Fund operating budget by an amount not to exceed $178,682 to properly account for RT’s contribution to the replacement of MDC and ICC equipment in Regional Transit patrol vehicles operated by Sacramento Police Department officers pursuant to the fourth amendment to Agreement 2011-0733. Resolution 2014-0296 August 26, 2014 Page 1 of 2 Adopted by the City of Sacramento City Council on August 26, 2014, by the following vote: Ayes: Members Ashby, Cohn, Hansen, McCarty, Schenirer and Warren Noes: None Abstain: None Absent: Member Fong and Mayor Johnson Vacant: District 8 Attest: Shirley Concolino, City Clerk Resolution 2014-0296 August 26, 2014 Page 2 of 2 Shirley A. Concolino Digitally signed by Shirley A. Concolino DN: cn=Shirley A. Concolino, o=City of Sacramento, ou=City Clerk, email=sconcolino@cityofsacramento.org, c=US Date: 2014.08.28 17:33:30 -07'00' 2014-0296 Council 8/26/2014 12:00:00 AM